ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. SUPREME COURT

The court’s impartiality was already doubtful following its 2010 Citizens United decision, which deemed corporations people for the purposes of campaign contributions.
From the column: "Voters who were reached by Trump’s campaign on the TikTok application are American citizens whose safety is at risk in the hands of the CCP."
From the column: "The fight for TikTok is about the future of free speech. Let’s ensure our digital town squares remain open, vibrant, and free from unwarranted government interference."
The justices affirmed a lower court's decision that had upheld the measure after it was challenged by TikTok, ByteDance and some of the app's users.

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Headlines
Unemployment insurance cases do not garner much attention, but when a court’s ruling can only be described as anti-religious and unconstitutional, citizens should take note.
The challengers are appealing a lower court's ruling that upheld the ban. TikTok is used by about 170 million Americans.
"In order to preserve our democracy, we must all commit to teaching our children about the importance of law and an independent judiciary,” she said in St. Paul
From the column: "Critical cases on the docket (are) poised to further limit bureaucratic overreach and restore accountability to our government."
From the column: "Justices likely will continue to side with powerful special-interest groups and corporations to the detriment of everyday Americans."
From the column: "A Harris-Walz administration likely would lead to even more diversity on both the federal and state court benches in Minnesota, and the dual impacts are likely to be felt here in the Northland."
From the column: "The most crucial part of the case is that the platforms are no different from newspapers, the archetypal bearers of free-press and free-speech rights."
"The Republicans on the court only added to the confusion."
If our Founders had wanted absolute immunity in any form for our chief executive, they would have written the idea into the Constitution just like they did for our legislators.
The court found Trump was absolutely immune for conversations with Justice Department officials.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT